Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Series home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Current volume
    • Past volumes
    • Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • Access for GSL Fellows
    • Access for other member types
    • Press office
    • Help
  • Alerts
    • eTOC alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Propose
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Geological Society, London, Memoirs
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Geological Society, London, Memoirs

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Series home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Current volume
    • Past volumes
    • Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • Access for GSL Fellows
    • Access for other member types
    • Press office
    • Help
  • Alerts
    • eTOC alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Propose

Submarine glacial landform distribution in the central Arctic Ocean shelf–slope–basin system

M. Jakobsson
Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 46, 469-476, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/M46.179
M. Jakobsson
Department of Geological Sciences, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 8, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden (e-mail: martin.jakobsson@geo.su.se)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: martin.jakobsson@geo.su.se
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The central Arctic Ocean, including its surrounding seas, extends over an area of c. 9.5×106 km2 of which c. 53% comprises shallow continental shelves (Jakobsson 2002) (Fig. 1a). The surface of this nearly land-locked polar ocean is at present dominated by a perennial sea-ice cover with a maximum extent every year in late February to March and a minimum in early to mid-September (Fig. 1a) (Serreze et al. 2007). Outlet glaciers producing icebergs that drift in the central Arctic Ocean exist on northern Greenland, Ellesmere Island and on islands in the Barents and Kara seas (Diemand 2001) (Fig. 1a). Ice shelves, although substantially smaller than those found in Antarctica, presently exist in some of Greenland's fjords (Rignot & Kanagaratnam 2006), on Severnaya Zemlya (Williams & Dowdeswell 2001) and along the northern coast of Ellesmere Island (Jeffries 1992; Williams & Ferrigno 2012). Existing ice shelves around the Arctic Ocean are primarily formed through accretion of multiyear sea ice and gain their mass from snowfall and/or basal freezing.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

(a) Bathymetric map of the Arctic Ocean and study areas (red boxes, map from IBCAO v. 3.0). Purple line is mean minimum sea-ice extent (September). Pink line is mean maximum sea-ice extent (March). AGT, Amundsen Gulf Trough; AP, Arlis Plateau; BS, Bering Strait; CP, Chukchi Plateau; CR, Chukchi Rise; FS, Fram Strait; HC, Herald Canyon; LR, Lomonosov Ridge; McT, M'Clure Trough; MJR, Morris Jesup Rise; MT, Mackenzie Trough; MR, Mendeleev Ridge; NS, Nares Strait; StT, St Anna Trough; YP, Yermak Plateau. (b) Ice-sheet extent during Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (from Ehlers & Gibbard 2004; Svendsen et al. 2004; England et al. 2009). LGM topography is from ICE-5G (Peltier 2004). (c) Western section of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago with outlines of the main CSTs (black line) and TMFs (black dashed line). TMF, trough-mouth fan. (d) 3D view of the CSTs in the western Canadian Arctic Archipelago.

The central Arctic Ocean has undergone substantial transformation with respect to physiography and ocean configuration during the major Quaternary glaciations. The c. 2550 m deep Fram Strait between Greenland and Svalbard (Fig. 1b) was the only remaining connection to the world ocean when sea level dropped by c. 120 m at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (Lambeck et al. 2014) and ice sheets occupied the Barents and Kara seas (Svendsen et al. 2004). Cross-shelf troughs eroded in the seafloor terminate at the continental shelf edge bordering the deep central Arctic Ocean basin (Fig. 1a). These, and the streamlined glacial bedforms within them, indicate where large ice streams were active during full-glacial periods (Batchelor & Dowdeswell 2014). Deep-drafted icebergs calved from the ice streams and drifted in the central Arctic Ocean before exiting through Fram Strait. Dated iceberg ploughmarks occur on bathymetric highs, extending into the central Arctic Ocean from the continental shelves, and on crests of ridges in the deep central basin (Jakobsson 1999; Polyak et al. 2001; Jakobsson et al. 2008; Dove et al. 2014). Furthermore, mapping of glacial landforms and sediment coring provide evidence for a c. 1 km thick ice shelf that may have covered the entire central Arctic Ocean during the peak of the Marine Isotope Stage 6 (MIS 6) glacial period c. 140 ka ago (Jakobsson et al. 2016). Large ice shelves may also have been present in the central Arctic Ocean during younger as well as older glaciations (Polyak et al. 2007; Jakobsson et al. 2014).

Here, the central Arctic Ocean glacial landform record that has emerged from geophysical mapping of High Arctic continental shelves and the ridges and plateaux of the central Arctic Ocean over the last two decades is set out. This record has permitted a re-examination of the hypothesis of an ice-sheet-fed floating ice-shelf system over the deep Arctic Ocean (Mercer 1970; Hughes et al. 1977).

Arctic Ocean continental-shelf landforms

Cross-shelf troughs (CSTs) and trough-mouth fans (TMFs)

The northernmost sectors of Barents, Kara, Beaufort and Lincoln seas and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago host bathymetrically well-defined cross-shelf troughs (CSTs) that terminate at the shelf break facing the deep central Arctic Ocean (Fig. 1a). Using the International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) digital bathymetric grid (v. 3.0; Jakobsson et al. 2012a), 20 CSTs with at least 150 m bathymetric expression were outlined and analysed by Batchelor & Dowdeswell (2014). They classified the troughs into three types using the characteristics of bathymetric profiles along the trough-axis and the presence or otherwise of a bathymetric bulge linked to glacial sediment deposition. Several of the identified CSTs can be traced back into one or more deep tributary fjords on adjacent landmasses such as Svalbard, Ellesmere Island and northern Greenland. The three largest CSTs, all extending more than 500 km in length, are the troughs of St Anna, M'Clure Strait and Amundsen Gulf (Batchelor & Dowdeswell 2014) (Fig. 1a, c, d). By contrast, the shallow and relatively flat continental shelves of the Laptev, East Siberian and Chukchi seas lack bathymetrically well-expressed CSTs (Fig. 1a).

Major sedimentary depocentres known as trough-mouth fans (TMFs) can be definitively mapped beyond the mouths of CSTs using high-resolution bathymetric mapping and seismic-reflection records (e.g. Vorren & Laberg 1997). These depocentres build up under full-glacial conditions when the ice streams occupying CSTs deliver large quantities of deformable subglacial sediment to the shelf edge (e.g. Vorren & Laberg 1997; Dowdeswell & Siegert 1999). Several of the CSTs identified by Batchelor & Dowdeswell (2014) appear to have associated TMFs at their mouths (Fig. 1); however, only those located in the North American sector of the Arctic Ocean are described from seismic-reflection profiles. 2D seismic-reflection profiles of the 10 000 km3 TMF associated with the large Amundsen Gulf Trough (Batchelor et al. 2014) (Fig. 1c) shows that the outer shelf is characterized by a prograding wedge of acoustically semi-transparent sediment up to 500 m thick containing eight sediment sequences relating to a series of past glacials. East of the Amundsen Trough is the huge M'Clure Strait Trough with a TMF estimated to be six times larger than that of Amundsen Gulf (Batchelor et al. 2014). To the west of Amundsen Gulf, however, the Mackenzie Trough appears to lack a well-developed TMF (Batchelor et al. 2014). By contrast, the mouth of Hinlopen Trough north of Svalbard provides an example of an area that is well mapped with modern multibeam technology (Batchelor et al. 2011; Hogan et al. 2013). The bathymetric data show that the Hinlopen Trough ends abruptly in the huge slide scar of Hinlopen Slide.

Streamlined landforms and transverse ridges

The seafloor of CSTs is often dominated by mega-scale glacial lineations (MSGLs) and closely related, but more subtle, streamlined linear to curvilinear glacial-sedimentary landforms (England et al. 2009; Hogan et al. 2010; Andreassen et al. 2014; Batchelor et al. 2014). Additional streamlined landforms, often with rock cores, are drumlins and crag-and-tails, for example those mapped in the Amundsen Gulf Trough (Batchelor et al. 2014; MacLean et al. 2015) and in some parts of Barents Sea CSTs (Ottesen et al. 2007; Hogan et al. 2010; Andreassen et al. 2014).

Large transverse-to-flow asymmetrical sedimentary wedges identified at the seafloor by subdued ridges, known as grounding-zone wedges (GZWs), are mapped within several CSTs ending at the shelf break facing the deep Arctic Ocean. Examples include GZWs in three of the troughs located in the Beaufort Sea: Mackenzie, Amundsen Gulf and M'Clure Strait troughs (Batchelor et al. 2014; Batchelor & Dowdeswell 2015). GZWs also exist in most of the CSTs that have been mapped using multibeam methods on continental shelves of western Svalbard and the Barents Sea (e.g. Ottesen et al. 2007; Rebesco et al. 2011; Andreassen et al. 2014). Although a lack of high-resolution seafloor imagery may explain why GZWs have not been identified in CSTs of the Lincoln and Kara seas, some of the mapped High Arctic troughs do apparently lack such features. An example is the Kvitøya Trough, NE of Svalbard (Hogan et al. 2010). Finally, it should be noted that there is a general similarity in morphology and size between the Arctic Ocean and Antarctic GZWs mapped in CSTs (Jakobsson et al. 2012b; Batchelor & Dowdeswell 2015).

Relatively small ridges both along and transverse to CST long-axes, and hence ice-flow direction, are present in many of the mapped troughs as well as outside on the flatter continental shelf (e.g. Ottesen et al. 2007; Hogan et al. 2010; Andreassen et al. 2014; Batchelor et al. 2014). Notably, such morainic ridges also exist in the East Siberian and Chuckhi seas on the continental slope in water depths even greater than 500 m, away from cross-shelf troughs and the shallow continental-shelf margin (Niessen et al. 2013; Dove et al. 2014; Jakobsson et al. 2016) (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Multibeam imagery of submarine glacial landforms from the central Arctic Ocean (located in Fig. 1a). (a) Recessional moraine ridges on the slope off Herald Canyon (Oden; modified from Jakobsson et al. 2016). (b) MSGL-like streamline landforms on Northwind Ridge (Healy). (c) Large iceberg ploughmarks on Morris Jesup Rise (Oden). (d) Two sets of MSGL-like landforms on Arlis Plateau (Oden; modified from Jakobsson et al. 2016). Multibeam acquisition system for USCGC Healy Seabeam 2140. Frequency 12 kHz. Grid-cell size 30 m. Multibeam acquisition system for IB Oden EM 122. Frequency 12 kHz. Grid-cell size 15 m.

Ice-keel ploughmarks

The vast continental shelves fringing the central Arctic Ocean are heavily scarred by iceberg ploughmarks as, for example, shown in extensive multibeam imagery of the shelf around Svalbard (Ottesen et al. 2007). Although there are regions where ploughmark patterns are influenced by prevailing directions of ocean currents, and hence iceberg drift, large areas of the continental shelf seafloor are dominated by apparently randomly orientated ploughmarks. However, the huge East Siberian Sea and inner Laptev Sea, and much of the Beaufort Sea, are very shallow with water depths often <50 m. Deep-keeled icebergs calved from major ice streams and outlet glaciers into the Arctic Ocean cannot drift into these shallow waters. In addition, much of the area of these shallow shelves was emergent above sea level during past full-glacial periods. The many chaotic ploughmark patterns identified on these shallow shelves are produced by sea-ice pressure ridge keels; examples come from the Laptev and Beaufort seas at water depths ≤40 m (e.g. Héquette et al. 1995; Ananyev et al. 2016).

Arctic Ocean ridge and plateau landforms

Areas of the Arctic Ocean seafloor that are not traditionally included as parts of the continental shelves that fringe the deep-ocean basin include both structural ridges such as the Lomonosov Ridge and extensive plateaux that extend from the continental shelf into the central Arctic Ocean basin, such as the Chukchi Rise and Plateau, Morris Jesup Rise and Yermak Plateau (Fig. 1a). The submarine landforms of these areas are described here.

Iceberg ploughmarks

Iceberg ploughmarks were mapped by Vogt et al. (1994) in water depths of at least 850 m on the Yermak Plateau (Fig. 1a). These ploughmarks were the first glacier-related landforms discovered beyond the continental shelves in the deep (>500 m) central Arctic Ocean. Prior to this, iceberg ploughmarks had been reported by Hunkins et al. (1962) from the <300 m deep flat-topped crest of the Chukchi Plateau (Fig. 1a). In the late 1990s, mapping of the Lomonosov Ridge between about 86 and 88° N revealed a flat-topped ridge crest down to about 1000 m below modern sea level (Jakobsson 1999; Polyak et al. 2001) (Fig. 3a, b), thought to be eroded by the impact of keels from armadas of icebergs (Kristoffersen et al. 2004). However, early data from the Lomonosov Ridge consisted primarily of seismic-reflection and sub-bottom profiles, which precluded detailed morphological characterization (Fig. 3b). Comprehensive seafloor imagery of some of the eroded areas on the Lomonosov Ridge only became available in 2014 (SWERUS-C3 expedition described further below).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

(a) Location map of Lomonosov Ridge (red box, map from IBCAO v. 3.0). (b) Chirp sonar profile showing stratigraphic unconformity on the Lomonosov Ridge caused by glacial erosion of the ridge crest (Jakobsson 1999). Chirp sonar acquisition system EdgeTech SC-512. Frequency 0.5–12 kHz (pulse 2–4 kHz, 100 ms long). (c) Multibeam bathymetry of Lomonosov Ridge showing MSGL-like features crossing it (modified from Jakobsson et al. 2016). Acquisition system EM 122. Frequency 12 kHz. Grid-cell size 15 m. (d) Bathymetric profile between y and y′ located in (c). VE×29.

Multibeam images of Morris Jesup Rise, extending north from the northern continental shelf of Greenland (Fig. 1), have also revealed large iceberg ploughmarks down to a maximum water depth of 1045 m (Jakobsson et al. 2010; Jakobsson & O'Regan 2016). The two largest mapped ploughmarks cut across the rise; their impact with its western flank indicate drift from west to east along the northern continental shelf of Greenland toward Fram Strait (Fig. 2c). The larger of these two ploughmarks has a width of about 500 m and a relief of 10 m.

Streamlined landforms and transverse ridges

Multibeam bathymetry from the Northwind Ridge and Chukchi Plateau (Fig. 1a) shows that their shallow crests, at water depths of >900 m, are imprinted by linear to slightly curved parallel grooves and ridges closely resembling MSGLs (Polyak et al. 2001; Jakobsson et al. 2008; Dove et al. 2014) (Fig. 2b). The eastern, inner section of the Chukchi Plateau also shows three partly mapped larger (up to 15 km wide by 2.5 km long, with 40 m relief) streamlined landforms, possibly drumlins, which are parallel in orientation to the adjacent MSGL-like features (Dove et al. 2014). The largest MSGL-like features on the Northwind Ridge are between 200 and 1000 m wide and have relief approaching 40 m from the ridge top to groove bottom (Jakobsson et al. 2008).

MSGL-like features, similar in size and spatial extent to those mapped on the Northwind Ridge and Chukchi Plateau, also exist on the flat-topped crest of the Yermak Plateau (Dowdeswell et al. 2010; Jakobsson et al. 2010). These were first mapped by Vogt et al. (1994) using side-scan sonar. They trend from NNW to SSE, suggesting an ice-flow direction from the central Arctic Ocean towards Fram Strait.

Multibeam data collected during the SWERUS-C3 expedition (2014, IB Oden) show that streamlined landforms cross the Lomonosov Ridge crest at about 85° N, 153° E (Fig. 3a, c) (Jakobsson et al. 2016). This is one of the flat-topped areas previously assumed to be eroded by armadas of icebergs. The grooves and ridges are highly parallel, have relief of c. 10–15 m, and are generally between 200 and 500 m wide, although some are >500 m wide, (Fig. 3c, d). They occur to a maximum water depth of <1000 m. The form of the flanks of the flat-topped ridge crest suggests a stoss side on the Makarov Basin side (Fig. 3a), implying ice flow across the ridge towards the Amundsen Basin.

Multibeam bathymetry collected from the southern section of the Lomonosov Ridge off the Siberian continental shelf at about 81° N, 143° E (Fig. 4) (SWERUS-C3; Jakobsson et al. 2016) revealed two sets of streamlined landforms with slightly different orientations on the ridge crest. Their widths range over c. 400–800 m and their relief is c. 10–15 m (Fig. 4b, c). These features strongly resemble MSGLs. In this section of the Lomonosov Ridge crest, the MSGL-like features extend as deep as 1280 m below present sea level on the Makarov Basin side, and reach c. 900 m on the Amundsen Basin side (Fig. 4d). Stoss and lee sides are more clearly developed here compared to the Lomonosov Ridge crest at about 85° N, 153° E. Inferred ice flow is diagonally across the ridge from the Makarov Basin towards the Amundsen Basin.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Multibeam bathymetry from the southern Lomonosov Ridge crest off the Siberian continental margin. (a) Location map (red box, map from IBCAO v. 3.0). (b) Bathymetric profile between x and x′ shown in (d). VE×23. (c) Multibeam image of the MSGL-like features. Multibeam acquisition system EM 122. Frequency 12 kHz. Grid-cell size 15 m. (d) Multibeam bathymetry of the Lomonosov Ridge crest showing MSGL-like features crossing the ridge (modified from Jakobsson et al. 2016).

The Arlis Plateau forms a <1000 m deep section of the Mendeleev Ridge at about 75° N, 180° E/W (Fig. 1a). Multibeam data show two sets of streamlined landforms on the plateau top (Niessen et al. 2013), one suggesting ice flow almost directly from the East Siberian Sea continental margin and the other indicating flow along the long-axis of the Mendeleev Ridge. Subsequent mapping (SWERUS-C3 expedition) showed the MSGL-like landforms to extend to a water depth of about 1200 m. Those emanating from the East Siberian margin (white arrows in Fig. 2d) appear older as they are overprinted by the second set.

Morainic ridges, probably formed transverse to the direction of past ice-flow, occur along the margins of the Chukchi Plateau and southern Northwind Ridge (Dove et al. 2014). On the Lomonosov Ridge, the flattened ridge crest off the Siberian continental shelf contains small arcuate ridges with a relief of about 6 m (Fig. 4d). These ridges have their pointed edges facing southwards, towards the youngest ice-flow direction across the ridge.

By contrast with CSTs on the continental shelves fringing the Arctic Ocean, GZWs are rarely identified on central Arctic Ocean bathymetric highs and ridges crests. However, on the flat crest of the southern Lomonosov Ridge at about 85° N, 153° E, there is a single faint sediment wedge with relief of about 15 m (Fig. 4d). There are GZW-like features mapped on the Northwind Ridge and Chukchi Plateau (Dove et al. 2014).

Discussion: an Arctic Ocean geomorphic system

Before submarine glacial landforms were mapped in the central Arctic Ocean, Mercer (1970) hypothesized the existence of a pan-Arctic ice shelf during full-glacial conditions. His hypothesis was based mainly on similarities between the Arctic Ocean and the former sea that once existed where the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) is presently located; if the WAIS was removed, the area it covered would, similarly to the Arctic Ocean, be a virtually land-locked water body located close to the geographic South Pole. Mercer therefore suggested that a cooler glacial climate would transform the Arctic Ocean into something similar to the WAIS. The Arctic Ocean may therefore under full-glacial conditions represent a cold extreme of the marine glacial realm. Building upon this reasoning, Hughes et al. (1977) produced a maximum ice-sheet reconstruction for the LGM where a c. 1 km thick ice shelf extended over the entire Arctic Ocean (Fig. 5). Inferred ice-shelf flow lines implied grounding on ridges and other bathymetric highs in the central Arctic Ocean basin (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Ice-sheet reconstruction of LGM after the maximum version of Hughes et al. (1977), including a 1 km thick ice shelf in the Arctic Ocean.

Does the glacial landform record support such a large ice-shelf system? The CSTs and associated landforms, including their TMFs, MSGLs and related streamlined landforms, GZWs and morainic ridges on the continental shelves, are interpreted to indicate where large ice streams drained the continental-shelf ice sheets into the central Arctic Ocean during full-glacial periods (e.g. Batchelor & Dowdeswell 2014) (Fig. 6). Mapped iceberg ploughmarks at >1000 m in present water depths suggest that some of these ice streams were capable of producing icebergs with drafts >880 m, assuming a full-glacial sea level 120 m lower than today. Presently available mapping data contain no signs of well-developed CSTs on the generally <100 m deep extensive shelf areas of the Chukchi, East Siberian and Laptev seas (Figs 1a, 6).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Schematic landform-assemblage model for the central Arctic Ocean shelf–slope–basin system.

However, the question of whether an ice sheet once existed over portions of this area, as suggested by Hughes et al. (1977) (Fig. 5), has recently been reopened due to the identification of landforms inferred to have been produced subglacially (Niessen et al. 2013). The retreat moraine ridges on the slope off Herald Canyon (Jakobsson et al. 2016; Fig. 3a) and on the slope of the East Siberian Sea (Niessen et al. 2013) are clear examples. Together with MSGL-like features on bathymetric highs and on ridges in the central Arctic Ocean Basin (e.g. Figs 2d, 3c, 4c, d), these glacial landforms have recently been interpreted by Jakobsson et al. (2016) to imply the former presence of a coherent c. 1 km thick ice-shelf extending over the entire central Arctic Ocean, similar to that first proposed by Mercer (1970) and later by Hughes et al. (1977). This newly proposed pan-Arctic ice shelf, based on submarine geomorphic evidence, was preceded by the suggestion of a smaller ice-shelf system confined to the Canadian Arctic Ocean based primarily on the discovery of MSGL-like features on the Northwind Ridge and Chukchi Plateau (Jakobsson et al. 2010) and along the Beaufort Sea continental margin (Engels et al. 2008). Prior to the collection of multibeam data from the Lomonosov Ridge crest, the first mapped evidence of ice grounding on the ridge crest was interpreted to signify a deep-keeled armada of drifting and grounding icebergs (Kristoffersen et al. 2004).

In summary, mapped landforms show traces of extensive inland ice-sheets, ice streams on the Arctic continental shelves and huge deep-drafting-associated ice shelves in the central Arctic Ocean during full-glacial conditions. This has led to the Arctic Ocean ice-shelf hypothesis formulated by Mercer (1970) being revisited (Jakobsson et al. 2016), based on detailed observational evidence of glacial landforms on the seafloor of the ridges, plateaux and shelves of the Arctic Ocean. Dating of sediment cores from these areas suggests that the most extensive ice-shelf system in the Arctic Ocean existed during MIS 6, about 140 ka ago. In addition, the existence of extensive ice-shelf systems from older glaciations (Polyak et al. 2007), or of younger, smaller ice-shelves of more limited thickness, cannot be excluded.

A full-glacial ice-sheet-fed ice shelf, at least 1000 m thick, covering the Arctic Ocean represents the greatest degree of ice cover in the Northern Hemisphere during the Quaternary Ice Age. Its reconstruction has only been possible due to the recent acquisition of swath-bathymetric evidence from the central Arctic Ocean and its surrounding high-latitude continental shelves, which is summarized in the schematic model in Figure 6. It is probably the fact that the Arctic Ocean is a deep-sea basin surrounded for the most part by landmasses that allowed a thick floating ice-shelf to develop during at least one full-glacial period. By contrast, the unprotected Southern Ocean margin of the Antarctic's continental ice sheet implies consistently high rates of mass loss by iceberg production that restrict the sustained growth of large ice-shelves beyond protected embayments such as the Ross and Weddell seas.

  • © 2016 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

References

  1. ↵
    Ananyev R., Dmitrevskiy N. et al. 2016. Sea-ice ploughmarks in the eastern Laptev Sea, East Siberian Arctic shelf. In: Dowdeswell J.A., Canals M., Jakobsson M., Todd B.J., Dowdeswell E.K. & Hogan K.A. (eds) Atlas of Submarine Glacial Landforms: Modern, Quaternary and Ancient. Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 46, 301–302, http://doi.org/10.1144/M46.109
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Andreassen K., Winsborrow M.C.M., Bjarnadóttir L.R. & Rüther D.C. 2014. Ice stream retreat dynamics inferred from an assemblage of landforms in the northern Barents Sea. Quaternary Science Reviews, 92, 246–257.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Batchelor C.L. & Dowdeswell J.A. 2014. The physiography of High Arctic cross-shelf troughs. Quaternary Science Reviews, 92, 68–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    Batchelor C.L. & Dowdeswell J.A. 2015. Ice-sheet grounding-zone wedges (GZWs) on high-latitude continental margins. Marine Geology, 363, 65–92.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    Batchelor C.L., Dowdeswell J.A. & Hogan K.A. 2011. Late Quaternary ice flow and sediment delivery through Hinlopen Trough, northern Svalbard margin: submarine landforms and depositional fan. Marine Geology, 284, 13–27.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    Batchelor C.L., Dowdeswell J.A. & Pietras J.T. 2014. Evidence for multiple Quaternary ice advances and fan development from the Amundsen Gulf cross-shelf trough and slope, Canadian Beaufort Sea margin. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 52, 125–143.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Diemand D. 2001. Icebergs. In: Turekian K.K., Steele J.H. & Thorpe S.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences. 1st edn. Academic Press, London, 3, 1255–1264.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Dove D., Polyak L. & Coakley B. 2014. Widespread, multi-source glacial erosion on the Chukchi margin, Arctic Ocean. Quaternary Science Reviews, 92, 112–122.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Dowdeswell J.A. & Siegert M.J. 1999. Ice-sheet numerical modeling and marine-geophysical evidence of glacier-derived sedimentation on the Eurasian Arctic continental margins. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 111, 1080–1097.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Dowdeswell J.A., Jakobsson M. et al. 2010. High-resolution geophysical observations of the Yermak Plateau and northern Svalbard margin: implications for ice-sheet grounding and deep-keeled icebergs. Quaternary Science Reviews, 29, 3518–3531.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Ehlers J. & Gibbard P.L. 2004. GIS files of ice extent provided. In: Ehlers J. & Gibbard P.L. (eds) Quaternary Glaciations – Extent and Chronology, Part II: North America. Developments in Quaternary Sciences, 2B. Elsevier. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/bookseries/15710866/2/part/PB
  12. ↵
    Engels J.L., Edwards M.H., Polyak L. & Johnson P.D. 2008. Seafloor evidence for ice shelf flow across the Alaska–Beaufort margin of the Arctic Ocean. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 33, 1047–1063.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    England J.H., Furze M.F.A. & Doupe J.P. 2009. Revision of the NW Laurentide Ice Sheet: implications for paleoclimate, the northeast extremity of Beringia, and Arctic Ocean sedimentation. Quaternary Science Reviews, 28, 1573–1596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Héquette A., Desrosiers M. & Barnes P.W. 1995. Sea ice scouring on the inner shelf of the Canadian Beaufort Sea. Marine Geology, 128, 201–219.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Hogan K.A., Dowdeswell J.A. et al. 2010. Submarine landforms and ice-sheet flow in the Kvitøya Trough, northwestern Barents Sea. Quaternary Science Reviews, 29, 3545–3562.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Hogan K.A., Dowdeswell J.A. & Mienert J. 2013. New insights into slide processes and seafloor geology revealed by side-scan imagery of the massive Hinlopen Slide, Arctic Ocean margin. Geo-Marine Letters, 33, 325–343.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Hughes T.J., Denton G.H. & Grosswald M.G. 1977. Was there a late-Würm Arctic ice sheet? Nature, 266, 596–602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Hunkins K., Herron T., Kutschale H. & Peter G. 1962. Geophysical studies of the Chukchi Cap, Arctic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 67, 235–247.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    Jakobsson M. 1999. First high-resolution chirp sonar profiles from the central Arctic Ocean reveal erosion of Lomonsov Ridge sediments. Marine Geology, 158, 111–123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Jakobsson M. 2002. Hypsometry and volume of the Arctic Ocean and its constituent seas. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 3, 1–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    Jakobsson M. & O'Regan M. 2016. Deep iceberg ploughmarks in the central Arctic Ocean. In: Dowdeswell J.A., Canals M., Jakobsson M., Todd B.J., Dowdeswell E.K. & Hogan K.A. (eds) Atlas of Submarine Glacial Landforms: Modern, Quaternary and Ancient. Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 46, 287–288, http://doi.org/10.1144/M46.14
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Jakobsson M., Polyak L., Edwards M., Kleman J. & Coakley B. 2008. Glacial geomorphology of the Central Arctic Ocean: the Chukchi Borderland and the Lomonosov Ridge. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 33, 526–545.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    Jakobsson M., Nilsson J. et al. 2010. An Arctic Ocean ice shelf during MIS 6 constrained by new geophysical and geological data. Quaternary Science Reviews, 29, 3505–3517.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Jakobsson M., Mayer L. et al. 2012a. The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) Version 3.0. Geophysical Research Letters, 39, L12609.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    Jakobsson M., Anderson J.B. et al. 2012b. Ice sheet retreat dynamics inferred from glacial morphology of the central Pine Island Bay Trough, West Antarctica. Quaternary Science Reviews, 38, 1–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    Jakobsson M., Andreassen K. et al. 2014. Arctic Ocean glacial history. Quaternary Science Reviews, 92, 40–67.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Jakobsson M., Nilsson J. et al. 2016. Evidence for an ice shelf covering the central Arctic Ocean during the penultimate glaciation. Nature Communications, 7, 10365, http://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10365
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    Jeffries M.O. 1992. Arctic ice shelves and ice islands: origin, growth and disintegration, physical characteristics, structural-stratigraphic variability, and dynamics. Reviews of Geophysics, 30, 245–267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Kristoffersen Y., Coakley B. et al. 2004. Seabed erosion on the Lomonosov Ridge, central Arctic Ocean: a tale of deep draft icebergs in the Eurasia Basin and the influence of Atlantic water inflow on iceberg motion? Paleoceanography, 19, PA3006.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    Lambeck K., Rouby H., Purcell A., Sun Y. & Sambridge M. 2014. Sea level and global ice volumes from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 15296–15303.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    MacLean B., Blasco S. et al. 2015. New marine evidence for a Late Wisconsinan ice stream in Amundsen Gulf, Arctic Canada. Quaternary Science Reviews, 114, 149–166.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    Mercer J.H. 1970. A former ice sheet in the Arctic Ocean? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 8, 19–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    Niessen F., Hong J.K. et al. 2013. Repeated Pleistocene glaciation of the East Siberian continental margin. Nature Geoscience, 6, 842–846.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    Ottesen D., Dowdeswell J.A., Landvik J.Y. & Mienert J. 2007. Dynamics of the Late Weichselian ice sheet on Svalbard inferred from high-resolution sea-floor morphology. Boreas, 36, 286–306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    Peltier W.R. 2004. Global glacial isostasy and the surface of the ice-age Earth: the ICE-5G (VM2) model and GRACE. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 32, 111–149.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    Polyak L., Edwards M.H., Coakley B.J. & Jakobsson M. 2001. Ice shelves in the Pleistocene Arctic Ocean inferred from glaciogenic deep-sea bedforms. Nature, 410, 453–459.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    Polyak L., Darby D., Bischof J. & Jakobsson M. 2007. Stratigraphic constraints on late Pleistocene glacial erosion and deglaciation of the Chukchi margin, Arctic Ocean. Quaternary Research, 67, 234–245.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    Rebesco M., Liu Y. et al. 2011. Deglaciation of the western margin of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet–A swath bathymetric and sub-bottom seismic study from the Kveithola Trough. Marine Geology, 279, 141–147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    Rignot E. & Kanagaratnam P. 2006. Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Science, 311, 986–990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Serreze M.C., Holland M.M. & Stroeve J. 2007. Perspectives on the Arctic's shrinking sea-ice cover. Science, 315, 1533–1536.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Svendsen J.I., Alexanderson H. et al. 2004. Quaternary ice sheet history of northern Eurasia. Quaternary Science Reviews, 23, 1229–1271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    Vogt P.R., Crane K. & Sundvor E. 1994. Deep Pleistocene iceberg plowmarks on the Yermak Plateau: sidescan and 3.5 kHz evidence for thick calving ice fronts and a possible marine ice sheet in the Arctic Ocean. Geology, 22, 403–406.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Vorren T.O. & Laberg J.S. 1997. Trough mouth fans – palaeoclimate and ice-sheet monitors. Quaternary Science Reviews, 16, 865–881.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    Williams M. & Dowdeswell J.A. 2001. Historical Fluctuations of the Matusevich Ice Shelf, Severnaya Zemlya, Russian High Arctic. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 33, 211–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    1. Williams R.S. Jr.. &
    2. Ferrigno J.G.
    (eds) 2012. State of the Earth's cryosphere at the beginning of the 21st century: Glaciers, global snow cover, floating ice, and permafrost and periglacial environments. US Geological Survey Professional Papers, 1386-A.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this volume

Geological Society, London, Memoirs: 46 (1)
Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Volume 46
2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

Submarine glacial landform distribution in the central Arctic Ocean shelf–slope–basin system

M. Jakobsson
Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 46, 469-476, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/M46.179
M. Jakobsson
Department of Geological Sciences, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 8, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden (e-mail: martin.jakobsson@geo.su.se)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: martin.jakobsson@geo.su.se

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

Submarine glacial landform distribution in the central Arctic Ocean shelf–slope–basin system

M. Jakobsson
Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 46, 469-476, 30 November 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/M46.179
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Geological Society, London, Memoirs article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Submarine glacial landform distribution in the central Arctic Ocean shelf–slope–basin system
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Geological Society, London, Memoirs
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Geological Society, London, Memoirs.
Print
Download PPT
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Arctic Ocean continental-shelf landforms
    • Arctic Ocean ridge and plateau landforms
    • Discussion: an Arctic Ocean geomorphic system
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • Chapter 1 Introduction to the geology of Myanmar
  • Chapter 1 An overview of the eruption of Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat from 2000 to 2010
  • Mapping submarine glacial landforms using acoustic methods
  • Chapter 1 An overview of the petroleum geology of the Arctic
  • Chapter 2 Active tectonics of Myanmar and the Andaman Sea
More...

Memoirs

  • About the series
  • Books Editorial Committee
  • Submit a book proposal
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Alerts & RSS
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
0435-4052
Online ISSN 
2041-4722

Copyright © 2019 Geological Society of London