Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Memoirs

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watts, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Young, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Memoirs; 2002; v. 21; p. 115-152;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.MEM.2002.021.01.06
© 2002 Geological Society of London

Volcanic processes, products and hazards

Growth patterns and emplacement of the andesitic lava dome at Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat

R. B. Watts1, R. A. Herd2, R. S. J. Sparks1 & S. R. Young2

1 Department of Earth Sciences, Wills Memorial Building, University of Bristol, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK Rob.Watts{at}bris.ac.uk
2 Montserrat Volcano Observatory, Mongo Hill, Montserrat, West Indies

Eruption of the Soufrière Hills Volcano on Montserrat allowed the detailed documentation of a Pélean dome-forming eruption. Dome growth between November 1995 and March 1998 produced over 0.3 km3 of crystal-rich andesitic lava. Discharge rates gradually accelerated from >1 m3 s-1 during the first few months to >5 m3 s-1 in the later stages. Early dome growth (November 1995 to September 1996) was dominated by the diffuse extrusion of large spines and mounds of blocky lava. A major dome collapse (17 September 1996) culminated in a magmatic explosive eruption, which unroofed the main conduit. Subsequent dome growth was dominated by the extrusion of broad lobes, here termed shear lobes. These lobes developed through a combination of exogenous and endogenous growth over many weeks, with movement accommodated along curved shear faults within the dome interior. Growth cycles were recognized, with each cycle initiated by the slow emplacement of a large shear lobe, constructing a steep flank on one sector of the dome. A growth spurt, heralded by the onset of intense hybrid seismicity, pushed the lobe rapidly out, triggering dome collapse. Extrusion of another lobe within the resulting collapse scar reconstructed the steep dome flanks prior to the next cycle.