Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Memoirs

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fortey, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Memoirs; 1995; v. 16; p. 93-102;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.MEM.1995.016.01.12
© 1995 Geological Society of London

Charles Lapworth and the biostratigraphic paradigm

Richard A. Fortey

Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK

Lapworth’s paper on ‘The Moffat Series’ (1878) provided a model for deciphering the ‘interminable greywackes’ of the Southern Uplands, and one which lasted for a century. The same paper established graptolites in a dominant position in Lower Palaeozoic biostratigraphy. The changes in the biostratigraphic paradigm are discussed with reference to Lapworth’s contribution; issues implicit in his 1878 paper are still contentious. Graptolites have exemplified the conflict that can arise between the use of fossils as stratigraphic ciphers, on the one hand, or as complex organisms to be interpreted biologically on the other. They have been subjected to the vicissitudes of stratigraphic fashion. It is shown that Lapworth’s biostratigraphy has been enduring in contrast to his structural or palaeogeographic interpretations. However, the subsequent separation of litho- and chrono- from biostratigraphy, while conceptually necessary, has encouraged an idealistic pursuit of the perfect stratigraphic section for the purpose of defining stratigraphic boundaries. This has not always been constructive, not least because such boundaries often coincide with events which militate against the preservation of ideal sections. But Lapworth’s close integration of biostratigraphic range with observations on lithology, ‘barren beds’ and fossil preservation may have a new lease of life in the context of event stratigraphy.