|
Department of Geology & Geophysics, SOEST, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
A controversy in the final decades of the last century developed between Geikie and Judd over the nature of the volcanoes in the British Tertiary Province. Geikie regarded the lavas as in Antrim and Skye as plateau basalts (today called flood basalts) erupted from widely scattered fissures, while Judd regarded the intrusion complexes as in Central Mull and Skye as eroded stumps of major central volcanoes from which the lavas originated. Soon after, instigated by the controversy, British volcanology flowered for several decades in what may be called its ‘Classic Period’. Detailed mapping projects were undertaken, and new concepts were developed that are basic to volcanology. This paper views the controversy and its aftermath, and also briefly reviews recent conceptual developments in the North Atlantic Volcanic Province of which the British Tertiary rocks are a part. The paper discusses the present understanding of flood basalts and central volcanoes, and presents new criteria based on structural features of lava flows (such as the dependence of lava thicknesses, and the occurrence of pipe vesicles, on ground-slope angle) to distinguish between them. Magnetic fabric study of magma-flow directions in intrusions and lava flows, and palaeomagnetic study of post-emplacement tilting of igneous rocks, have great unrealized potential.
